Monday, March 11, 2013

My Grandfather's Funeral

My grandparents holding my mother
On January 25, 2013, my grandfather, Roger Hightower passed away. He was 86 years old and had spent the last several years of his life struggling with a failing mind and a failing body. But on that Friday morning all the problems of this life died with that old body as he entered fully into eternal life. Revelation 21:3-4 helps us picture the new life he is enjoying in his new body.
Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God. He will wipe away every tear from their eyes and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.
I am confident that my grandfather is experiencing this life now. I know this because he loved God. My grandfather had a deep and meaningful relationship with God. This relationship started when he realized that he needed forgiveness and that God would be faithful and just to forgive. In my grandfather's memoirs he records:
I can't remember the exact day and date of my conversion, but I do remember the place, and that it happened. It was at the Pilgrim Holiness Church in Owosso, Michigan. The preacher was Rev. Paul F. Elliot, Sr. (who was a fiery preacher) It happened on a Sunday night. Elmorse and I went to the altar in the night service. I think that I was about 5 or 6 years old at the time. I know the Lord did something in my heart at that time. I haven't ever had any desire to rebel against the Lord at any time until now. I know that I haven't always been without fault, but I do know that my heart has always wanted to obey the Lord and do just what He wanted me to do. In my childish mind, I went to the altar many times after that because I didn't understand what the whole Christian life was all about. I didn't understand that as 1 John 1:9 says "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness". I thought that any sin separated us immediately from the Lord and that we had to begin all over again. I have been so thankful for that verse as it gives me hope that I can make heaven my eternal home. Isn't the Lord good....? As of this writing (March 11, 2000), I am well into my 73rd year and the Lord has kept me all these years. I have gone too far to turn back now, I am planning on seeing my loved ones who have gone on before and making heaven my home.
When you bury a loved one, it is an immense blessing to have words like this to cling to. My grandfather was confident both in his need for mercy and in God's eagerness to show mercy. It is this faith in the abundant love and mercy of God, demonstrated and secured by the death of his own Son, that has secured my grandfather's eternal destiny.

Each of us must experience death. First we see the death of those we know and love. Eventually, it will be our turn, and we will follow them into the grave. My prayer is that we will not waste the deaths of our loved ones by failing to prepare for our own. Instead, like my grandfather, we must confess our sins and place our trust in the love and mercy of the God who is so eager to forgive us and welcome us into his kingdom.

The funeral itself is too long to add to YouTube. However I did extract the portion where I was allowed to share some of how I was blessed by the life and death of my grandfather. I will include that video below.



Friday, December 7, 2012

The Big Picture

Christmas should be fun, right? Then why did God start the Christmas story with a genealogy? Matthew 1:1-17 is a long list of names telling us the names of Jesus' father, grandfather, great-grandfather, great great-grandfather, great great great-grandfather, and so on.  It starts with Matthew 1:1
The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 
And ends with vs. 17,
So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations.
That's a lot of generations and a lot of names. And most of us agree, its no fun reading someone else's family tree.

The question is, what makes this family tree so important? Why are we asked to suffer through reading such a long lineage? There are probably several answers, but one seems to be the most obvious. God wants us to know that Jesus isn't the beginning of the story, he is the climax of a much longer story.

When we read the Christmas story this month, it is important to remember that we have skipped to the end of the book. It would be like picking up Lord of the Rings, but starting when Frodo finally gets to Mordor to throw the ring into the fires of Mount Doom. Without having read the first two books, this third climactic book lacks the depth of context and characters that makes it so compelling. The Bible is the same way. It is the Old Testament that adds the depth and context to Jesus' miraculous birth, life, death, and resurrection. We cannot rightly understand the climax without understanding how it fits into the whole story.

If you don't have time to read the entire Bible before Christmas day, I suggest this poem as a good temporary substitute. Matt Papa delivers a dramatic reading of a poem summarizing the entire story of God in about ten minutes. It will help us all remember the context that leads up to the birth of Jesus and then remind us of the significance that Jesus life and death continues to have for us today.


If you have a little more time and you have kids (you are probably thinking that is an oxymoron), I suggest picking up the Big Picture Story Bible. It is one of the best, succinct presentations of the whole story of the Bible. Your kids will learn from it and you will too.

Merry Christmas!


Friday, November 16, 2012

A Lesson in Economics

Everyone said that this year's presidential election was all about economics, but at the end of the day, how many Americans can even articulate an economic theory that guides their voting?

Maybe 2016 will be different. Kanon is teaching Civics to high school seniors this year. This means spending several weeks studying economics with the future of America. Her task is to present economic theory in a way that help students understand how to spend and how to vote. Hopefully that means that around 80 students will have an economic theory that informs their vote.

But how exactly can you help American teenagers understand economics? Let's be honest, not many high schoolers are chomping at the bit to learn about markets. Perhaps Kanon should don a fake mustache and take up hip-hop. It was the strategy of these two videos and I thought it worked rather well.


The second video speaks more specifically to the last 4 years of economic policy in America.


So what do you think? Is America following Keynes or Hayek? Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

The Bible and Wealth
The Bible is not an economics book. It is not written to convince us to follow Keynes' or Hayek's economic vision.  But that doesn't mean that the Bible doesn't talk about money. In fact, money is a rather common topic in Scripture. Allow me to share just one passage and two implications.
Behold, to the LORD your God belong heaven and the heaven of heavens, the earth with all that is in it. Yet the LORD set his heart in love on your fathers and chose their offspring after them, you above all peoples, as you are this day. Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no longer stubborn. For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, the mighty, and the awesome God, who is not partial and takes no bribe. He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the sojourner, giving him food and clothing. Love the sojourner, therefore, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt. You shall fear the LORD your God. (Deuteronomy 10:14–20).
We Are Only Stewards
Everything in the earth, all of its wealth, belongs to God. The Christian can never say, like a little five year old, "that's mine." We know that everything in the earth belongs to God. We only act as stewards of His possessions. 

Acting as a steward is a big responsibility. Jesus uses a parable to explain our responsibility in Matthew 25:14-30. He compares God to a master who leaves his money with several servants while he is away on a trip. Some of the servants steward the money well, bringing a return on the master's investment. Another servant simply hides the money away, failing to use the money with wisdom. When the master returns he scolds the servant saying: ‘You wicked and slothful servant!... you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest.

Certainly, Jesus was speaking of more than money in this parable, but not less. The whole world belongs to God, and everything in it. We are simply His stewards. It is our responsiblity to fear Him and to steward His resources wisely.

God Invests in People
God owns everything, but He especially loves people. Though everything in heaven and Earth belong to God, He "set His heart in love on our fathers." As stewards, this is vitally important information. If we want to invest our money well, we must look for rewards that God values.

This seems to be the counsel of 1 Timothy 6:17-19.
As for the rich in this present age, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly provides us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, thus storing up treasure for themselves as a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is truly life.
God gives us riches, but we aren't to set our hopes in them. Instead, we share them, seeking to bless those around us. It is by loving the people that God loves that we store up for ourselves a treasure for an eternal future with God.

Conclusions
Though the Bible doesn't argue for Keynesian or Hayekian economics, it does give us principles that guide our thinking. Christians can reasonably support either theory, however we must always seek to wisely and faithfully steward God's good gifts and to use those gifts to bestow blessings on others. While our short and long term strategies may differ, we should find unity in our overall financial worldview.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

The Prejudice of Abortion

Racism is a sin. I believe that with all my heart. In my mind, the classic children's song still holds true:
Jesus loves the little children,
all the children of the world.
Red and yellow, black and white,
they are precious in His sight.
I am convinced that Jesus loves people of all colors, all nationalities, and both genders. That is why I was so surprised to hear two times this week that white evangelicals' disdain for abortion may flow from a heart of racism.

Two Charges of Racism
The first charge was from a friend who criticized Al Mohler's (the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) remark that this election was a "disaster for evangelicals." In an interview with NPR, Mohler explained that the last election was a loss for those who held his view concerning the importance of life and marriage issues. My friend responded that not all evangelicals shared Mohler's view and suggested that Mohler's comments reflect a degree of racism that shapes white evangelical thinking.

The second charge was made on a much bigger stage. An MSNBC television journalist, Nancy Giles, suggested that white people wanted to eliminate abortion in order to "build up their race." You can watch her deliver the charge below:


The Blaze covered this story and reported that Giles is claiming that she was only joking. However, as the Blaze article points out, the host of the show responded with "There’s always eugenics associated with these questions.” And Giles could be heard saying,”How creepy, right?”

A Response
My first response is to think, this is ridiculous. I want to see an end to all abortion. I want to us to strive to save the lives of white babies, black babies, Chinese babies... all babies. For this reason, I have typically seen racism and abortion as two separate issues. But as I read a little further, I have realized that there may be a link between abortion and racism - and that link may surprise you.

Consider the following video by "The Radiance Foundation."


The numbers show that black babies are killed by abortion at a rate far higher than any other race in America. The Radiance Foundation reports that 38.5% of abortions are performed on black babies, while only 13% of the American population is black. Perhaps even more shocking is that 94% of abortion clinics are found in urban areas. Those statistics, to many, suggest that companies like Planned Parenthood are targeting poor minority groups. To many, this suggests that there may be a link between racism and abortion.

A Fair Picture
In all honesty, I don't believe that the majority of abortion providers, or abortion participants, are consciously racist. I cannot say the same for the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who had clear ties to the KKK and is repeatedly quoted as suggesting that abortion is the greatest eugenic tool for eliminating the genetically and racially inferior. But many who continue to support Planned Parenthood are either ignorant of its historical origins or believe that it has advanced beyond its racist beginnings.

However, I do believe that anyone who claims to care about racial equality should be shocked by the abortion statistics. Abortion is a civil rights issue on two fronts. The weakest segment of our population, the unborn, is being routinely targeted and murdered (over 55 million have been killed in the USA since Roe v. Wade). And, the poorest segment of our population, ethnic minorities, are being targeted and killed at a rate nearly 3x's higher than the majority.

On further investigation, there appears to be a stronger link between abortion and racism than we might have expected. I pray that our love for "the least of these" will continue to push all Christians to love, protect, and care for the unborn and for ethnic minorities.

On a final note, if you have seven minutes to spare, please take the time to listen to John Piper's address on this topic.


Thursday, October 25, 2012

A Different Response to Leno

Last night on the Jay Leno Show, Leno asked President Obama to respond to the recent comments by Richard Mourdock that has sparked a bit of a media frenzy. If you missed it, I will attach a clip below.



I think we will soon see people begin to question parts of Obama's response. For instance, Why would Obama, a self proclaimed Christian, claim to not know how Christians come up with the idea that God is sovereign and in control of every pregnancy? I expect even more will complain that Obama is continuing to say that Planned Parenthood provides mammograms, even though that has been repeatedly shown to be untrue.

What I would like to do here is a little bit different. Instead of criticizing the President's response, allow me to simply show how I would have responded if Leno were to give me the opportunity.

Leno: 
The senate candidate Richard Mourdock made a statement today, "I struggled with it myself for a long time, but came to the conclusion that life is a gift from God and even if life begins in the horrible situation of rape, it is something that God intended to happen. This seems like we're back to Todd Akin time again."

My response:
Jay, I won't distance myself from the idea that God is in control, even during the worst moments of human history.

I think the Bible clearly teaches this in several places; perhaps most famously in the story of Joseph. In the last chapter of the book of Genesis, Joseph's brothers find Joseph to be the 2nd in command of the most powerful nation on earth at the time. They had come to beg for food because they were starving, but when they saw Joseph, what they did to him many years before came rushing back into their minds. They had tried to kill him, but one brother convinced the others that instead of murder, they could sell him as a slave and make a little money out of the deal. So they beat him up and threw him in a pit and held him there until a slave trader showed up that could buy him. Now, years later, they see Joseph - and he is powerful. They are worried because they know they did evil and they think that only evil can come from evil. But Joseph tells them, "What you meant for evil, God has meant for good." Joseph forgives his brothers and feeds them, and by doing so, he saves the entire nation of Israel.

As a Christian, I believe God can do the same thing when rape happens. Rape is horrible thing. It is wrong and the Bible is clear about it. There is absolutely no condition that makes rape acceptable in the eyes of God and there should be no condition that makes rape acceptable in the eyes of the United States government. However, just because rape is wrong, and God hates it, doesn't mean He can't bring something wonderful out of it.

That's what Christians think all babies are. We think a baby is a wonderful gift from God. In the midst of the worst that mankind can offer - God can provide a beautiful, loving gift that reminds us of his steadfast love.

There are people watching your show tonight who were conceived out of rape or incest. I believe that what their biological father did was wrong. I believe that God hates what their biological father did. But at the same time, these people, watching your show tonight are a reminder that God can bring good out of a horrible situation. Their father and their mother may not have planned on them. But God did. In Psalms we read that these people, born in such horrible circumstances, were knit together by God in their mother's womb. The Psalmist explains that they were fearfully and wonderfully made by God.

So, I will not distance myself from a position that claims that children born into horrible circumstances are still a wonderful gift from God. I will not distance myself from a position that says God specially designs each baby, and loves them. And despite the trouble that these children are born into, I will not advocate any position that views these children as less than a beautiful gift from God.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The Gospel of Jesus' Wife: Some Preliminary Thoughts

A picture of the "Gospel of Jesus' Wife." The recent
discovery by Dr. Karen King of Harvard. Measuring
4cm x 8cm, the fragment is smaller than a business card.
If you haven't already heard, you probably will soon. A Harvard Professor, Dr. Karen King, has discovered and is publishing a fragment from what she calls, "The Gospel of Jesus' Wife." Several news sources have already picked up on this story, including the NBC video which I am including below.  Some of these news sources are describing the find as a "blockbuster." However, I believe a few preliminary observations can keep us from getting led astray in all the hype.


Facts About the Manuscript
Dr. King has published a 52 page paper that details the discovery of the fragment, explains the research that has gone into verifying its authenticity, and offers a preliminary interpretation of the text. Thanks to Andy Witt who directed me to her article, "And Jesus said to them, 'My wife'...: A New Coptic Gospel Papyrus." The following facts come from her article.

The fragment was brought to Dr. King by an anonymous donor, who apparently owned the fragment for nearly 30 years before bringing it to her. It is possible that some will suggest that this fragment is a forgery because of its peculiar history, however Dr. King details convincing evidence that this fragment is indeed from the 4th Century (300-399AD). There is no need for faithful Christians to challenge the authenticity of this fragment, and it seems that they would be on shaky ground if they did.

The reason that the fragment may prove controversial is that the 4th line of the text is translated "And Jesus said to them, 'My wife..." Dr. King is responsible for the translation and she has supplied the original Sahidic text and her translation for comparison. What is most important for our purposes is to note that the fragment provides an incredibly small sample of text. The sentence being attributed to Jesus literally only consists of a subject, "my wife," but no other information is provided to help us interpret the sentence.

Don't Buy the Sizzle
I don't know who first said "sell the sizzle, not the steak," but I believe it has become the golden standard of news media. Because of this, I don't doubt that coverage of this story will seek to ruffle feathers and perhaps challenge the way Christians have accepted the traditions that have been handed down through the ages. However, the following three points will hopefully convince us that there is no sizzle to buy and prevent us from unwarranted doubt as the story continues to play in the media.
  1. This fragment is not a reliable guide for finding the "historical Jesus."
  2. Fortunately, Dr. King readily admits that this fragment is not reliable historical evidence for determining what the "real Jesus" was really like. However, we should be prepared for other scholars to show less constraint. In fact, this is the kind of document that the "Da Vinci Code" craze was based on and that almost every History Channel or Discovery Channel documentary uses as evidence.

    The manuscripts these scholars rely on are typically 200 years older than the gospel accounts in our Bible. Yet, some scholars have preferred the older manuscripts for their reconstruction of Jesus to the 4 gospels in our New Testaments. The reason for this odd preference is that they present Jesus as a more human figure. "Scientific" study of the Bible rules out the possibility of a divine figure who could work miracles and raise from the dead. They assume these outlandish stories are myths developed by the devout. Therefore, they believe that even though fragments such as these are much older, their more human depiction of Jesus must be less biased.

    Bias, however, can be a two-edged sword. For instance, an anti-supernatural bias has led many scholars to reject early, widespread, accounts of the life of Jesus in preference of rare, incomplete, and late accounts that diminish the deity of Jesus. With this in mind, Christians are under no obligation to find these late manuscripts to be a more reliable guide on Jesus that the 4 gospels we have in the New Testament

  3. We already know that there was debate (and heresy) in the early church period.
  4. While Dr. King admits that this fragment doesn't tell us much about the actual Jesus, she does suggest that it proves that some Christians thought Jesus had a wife. I don't believe the document necessarily proves that, but I will reserve that for the next point. Here we need only say that debate concerning the person and nature of Jesus during the early church period is not newsworthy.

    Any student of Church History knows that the early church period is largely defined by its development of the doctrine of Christ. Much of this was due to a rise in other groups, claiming to be Christian, but redefining who Jesus was and what he did. Much of the theology we take for granted today was hammered out by the early church in the face of a variety of heresies including gnosticism and Arianism.

    Where we would disagree with Dr. King is that the term "Christian" is a fit descriptor for these other groups. While these groups may have claimed to be Christian, the early church condemned their teaching and declared their theology as outside the bounds of the true church. In the early church, as today, simply talking about Jesus did not make you a Christian. You had to believe in the Christ presented in the Scriptures. Only through faith in the Jesus of Scripture could one find salvation, and rightly be called a Christian.

  5. Scholarly speculation should not be accepted as fact.
  6. Finally, Dr. King suggests that the phrase "and Jesus said to them, 'My wife'..." proves that there was a group of Christians who thought Jesus was married. In reality, this phrase does not prove this at all. Jesus occasionally referred to family members in metaphorical terms. For instance in Matthew 12:50 Jesus says, "For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” Further, Ephesians 5:22-24 is one of many places that the church is depicted as the wife of Christ.

    Again, we already know that there was great debate concerning Jesus during the early church. We also know that some sources, though discounted are heretical, even maintained that Jesus was married. We have no need to suggest that this fragment does not suggest that Jesus had a wife. The point here is that scholars often suggest that something is proven when it is only possible.

    Like the news, scholars are rewarded for making strong statements. The history channel isn't looking for "I don't know." Therefore, something that is speculative can easily be cast as something that is certain. With this in mind, as we watch the news unfold the story of this new fragment, we should listen with a healthy dose of skepticism, not trusting outlandish claims simply because they are backed by "scholarly opinion."
Don't Be A Wave Tossed By The Wind
In the book of James we are told to ask for wisdom. His exact words are:
If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind.
2,000 years later we still need to make that same request. Our television will offer arguments that seem designed to turn us into a wave of the sea, tossed by the wind. My hope is that a little information, combined with the wisdom of God, can equip us to endure this latest squall.
______________________________
Update: In the post I claimed that denial of the authenticity of this fragment would be made on shaky ground. However it seems I may have spoken too soon. The Evangelical Textual Criticism blog posted this article claiming that many who were present for Dr. King's presentation have expressed skepticism. Discussion of Coptic print and papyrus is well beyond my pay grade so I will be content to wait for the smoke to settle on this issue.

Regardless, even if the fragment were universally accepted as legitimate, I maintain that this would pose no real threat to Evangelical Christian thought for the reasons listed above.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Don't Be A Spiritual 5th Grader

How do you measure maturity? It is typically easy to see immaturity in others, but much more difficult to see in ourselves. Perhaps part of the reason is that we don’t have a good way to measure maturity. As a Youth Director for the YMCA I began to recognize that students generally fall into one of three levels of maturity based on the kinds of games they would play. I believe we can measure our spiritual maturity based on very similar criteria. Let me explain…

Using Games to Measure Maturity 
The youngest kids are obviously the least mature and that’s clear by the kinds of games they like to play. Kindergarten and first graders love simple games. Games like Duck Duck Goose and Candy Land are some of their favorites because they don't have to think - they just play. For the youngest kids, variations to the game must be kept to an absolute minimum. Perhaps, after a few rounds of Duck Duck Goose you can run in the opposite direction. Anything beyond that and the kids are lost and the game is over.

Being the least mature has some benefits. This group is probably the easiest to please. But because their games lack the depth of the games older students play, they can’t hold their attention for very long. And, quite honestly, their games aren’t as fun – the kindergarteners just don’t realize it yet.

4th and 5th graders, on the other hand, are moving into the second level of maturity and this means an entirely different kind of game is necessary. Duck Duck Goose and Candy Land are child's play, these kids wanted a challenge. They are ready for the world to know that they aren't kids anymore and their games need to prove it. For these kids good games require some sort of strategy or skill. A game dies a fierce death in a 5th grader's eyes if he or she thinks it is too simple or childish. In fact, most kids at this level of maturity would prefer to struggle through a game that is too hard than be caught playing a game that is too simple.

The final stage of maturity doesn't usually show up until middle school or high school. The most mature kids are obvious because they can enjoy the complex games and the simple ones. The mature students continue to play their more complex games and they continue to get better at them. What sets them apart is that they are willing to go back and play the childish games as well. As a director of a program, it is so nice to have mature students around. They are the ones who are happy to play Duck Duck Goose with the kindergarteners, and even let the younger kids win sometimes. The most mature kids know that the way you play a game and whom you play it with is far more important than the game itself.

If you have worked with kids of different ages, you probably already know this to be true. The question that remains is, what does this have to do with spiritual maturity? An interesting article by Timothy Larson helped me put the pieces together. His article, “Religion is Wasted on the Young,” helped me realize that even though I am an adult, it is far too easy for me to act like a spiritual 5th Grader.

My Path Toward Maturity 
I was a young child when I became a Christian so it really is no surprise that I was immature both physically and spiritually. Bible stories were nice – I thought flannelgraphs were cool – but they couldn’t hold my attention for too long. Even as I matured physically, progressing right through middle and high school, my spiritual life stayed in this first level of maturity.

In fact, I didn’t start to enter my spiritual adolescence until I was nearly 20 years old as a student at Virginia Tech. I became involved in Campus Crusade for Christ and it was through their ministry that I began to experience a true revival in my heart. I became more excited about Bible study and developed close Christian friends that pushed me to know God more and serve Him more faithfully.

The strange thing was that this revival changed the way I viewed my church back home. When I would return home I didn't feel like returning to the home team. Instead I felt like I had been promoted to the varsity and was just visiting the J.V. squad. Didn't they know that real Christians sang cool Passion songs, not hymns?

My ability to criticize past teachers grew ten-fold when I began to study theology, especially the doctrine of salvation. It seems strange now, but the more I learned about God's grace, the less gracious I became toward my former teachers. I thought, "the gospel is so exciting, so amazing - why in the world is this the first time I have truly understood who Jesus is and what his death meant for me?" Someone has to be at fault, perhaps betraying more pride than I care to admit, I assumed that the fault must lie with my teachers.

Larson explained a similar experience during his spiritual adolescence. He describes one of his awakening moments, saying,
I recently ran into a woman who had taught me Sunday school as a child and was disconcerted to discover that she was not the simplistic thinker that as an adult I have taken her to be. I suspect that I had projected onto her the limitations of my own young self. 
The truth is that I had become a spiritual 5th Grader. I forgot that when the teachers of my past were teaching me, I was a very different person. The teachers that I remembered were teaching a spiritual kindergartener. Sure, now I am happy to sit and listen to an hour-long lecture by D.A. Carson on the relationship between the Old and New Testament. Then, my teachers would have thought it was a miracle if I simply brought my Bible to church, much less opened it to read along. It is unfair when I criticize the teachers who laid the foundation because they weren’t the artisans crafting the elaborate finishing touches.

Moving to the Third Stage of Spiritual Maturity
Like Paul, I can say, “Not that I have already obtained this or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own” (Philippians 3:12). That is, I don’t claim to be in the third level of spiritual maturity, but I am moving in that direction. The question is, what will this third stage look like? How will I recognize true spiritual maturity? Larson explains,
Christ calls us to become like children again. Counterintuitively, part of what this might mean is that there comes a time to get over our mocking, knowing, puncturing phase and learn to be true grown-ups. This is the maturity that once again allows us to proclaim truth in all simplicity, to be like children. To say it another way, true grown-ups can parent. 
In the same way that I recognize that a high school student who plays Duck, Duck, Goose with a kindergartener is mature, my willingness to enter back into the simple, for the sake of another, is a measure of spiritual maturity. To be clear, spiritual maturity is not becoming a kindergartener again. It is not losing your spiritual attention span or forgetting the glories or the splendor of the cross. This would not be spiritual progression, but spiritual regression. So what should spiritual maturity look like? I think three things mark this final spiritual stage:
  1. Like an 5th grader, you long for the deep and challenging side of Christianity. You enjoy to continually grow in your knowledge of the complexities of theology and the nature of God. You enjoy to read the Bible and to talk with others about what it means. In Paul’s language, you have moved from milk to solid food (1 Corinthians 3:1-3).

  2. Like a kindergartener, you still delight in the simple. "Jesus Loves You" still has meaning. Childlike faith that longs to hear God’s voice and would unquestioningly follow all his commands characterizes this kind of maturity.

  3. Like a parent, you are happy to patiently work through the simple for the sake of someone you love. It’s not that parents love Sesame Street, but they love to see their children learn and grow. That is perhaps the highest mark of spiritual maturity.